فلوریان اشمیت ، فلوریان اشمیت ( ترجمه شده توسط علامت گذاری به عنوان Riege)، 2019/05/24صفحه نمایش لمسی تلفنهای هوشمند Android ARM
دوقلو. تقریباً باید با یک ذره بین نگاه کنید تا تفاوت های میان Huawei P Smart 2019 و P Smart Plus 2019 را پیدا کنید. در تست ما بدانید که آیا مدل پلاس ارزش قیمت اضافی کوچک را دارد یا خیر.
هواوی P Smart Plus 2019
سال گذشته چیزها هنوز نظم داشتند: اختلافات بین P Smart (20) و P Smart + (20) واضح بود و به همین دلیل طراحی "پلاس" کاملاً موجه بود. اما اکنون در سال 2019 ، شرایط تغییر کرده است و امسال P Smart + دقیقاً شبیه مدل بدون نام "Plus" است: اندازه آن یکسان است ، پردازنده مشابه را ارائه می دهد ، و به سختی 10 یورو (11 پوند) هزینه دارد . آیا اصلاً اختلافاتی وجود دارد؟ بله ، البته این دو در بعضی از مناطق به ویژه در دوربین و رنگ کیس با یکدیگر تفاوت دارند.
در تست ما ، P Smart Plus (2019) را با P Smart Plus (20) ، P Smart (2019) و سایر تلفن های هوشمند این محدوده قیمت مقایسه می کنیم: موتورولا موتو جی 7 ، Honor 10 Lite و سامسونگ گلکسی M20 .
good (85%)
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Smartphone - 05/23/2019 - v6
دستگاه تست با ادای احترام از cyberport.de
تصویر رتبه بندی مجاز خود را به عنوان PNG / SVG بارگیری کنید
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 ( سری P )
پردازندهHiSilicon Kirin 710
آداپتور گرافیکیARM Mali-G51 MP4
حافظه3072 مگابایت
نمایش دادن6.21 اینچ 19.5: 9 ، 2340 x 1080 پیکسل 415 PPI ، صفحه لمسی خازنی ، IPS ، براق: بله
ذخیره سازی64 GB eMMC Flash ، 64 گیگابایت
، 64 GB eMMC ، 55 گیگابایت رایگان
وزن160 g ( = 5.64 oz / 0.35 pounds), Power Supply: 62 g ( = 2.19 oz / 0.14 pounds)
Price259 Euro
LinksHuawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
see all specifications
[+] Add to comparison» Compare devices 0
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!
Currently wanted:
News and Editorial Editor - Details here
Case – Other color variations than for the P Smart (2019)
Gigaset GS190
71% Review Gigaset GS190 Smartphone – Too expensive despite large battery?
Review TP-Link Neffos X20: Cheap smartphone with long battery life
74% Review TP-Link Neffos X20: Cheap smartphone with long battery life
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU Laptop Review: $00 for Single-Channel RAM
83% Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU Laptop Review: $00 for Single-Channel RAM
Gigaset GS195
71% Review Gigaset GS195 Smartphone - Mobile phone from German production
Next Page ⟩
You can get the Huawei P Smart+ 2019 in Midnight Black and Starlight Blue, which is a slightly different variation of blue than in the Huawei P Smart (2019). Otherwise the case is identical in terms of size, weight, and looks, aside from the third camera module that is offered additionally by the Plus model and is seated separately below the already known dual-camera module.
In terms of differences compared to the P Smart + (20), you can also immediately identify the third camera module, the smaller waterdrop notch and the slightly lower weight. The display is slightly smaller, and the case is minimally more compact than that from last year.
In terms of both the look and feel, we were already annoyed with the P Smart (2019) by the protective foil for the screen that is obviously glued on, and this is also present in the P Smart Plus 2019. The back continues to be glossy, smooth, and somewhat susceptible to fingerprints.
While the stability is decent, pressure on the back becomes visible in the liquid crystal display of the smartphone. The smartphone can only be warped minimally and there is no creaking in response.
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Size Comparison
Samsung Galaxy M20 Huawei P Smart Plus Motorola Moto G7 Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 Huawei P Smart 2019 Honor 10 Lite
156.4 mm / 6.16 inch
74.5 mm / 2.93 inch
8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch
6 g
0.4101 lbs
157.6 mm / 6.2 inch
75.2 mm / 2.96 inch
7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch
169 g
0.3726 lbs
157 mm / 6. inch
75.3 mm / 2.96 inch
8 mm / 0.315 inch
172 g
0.3792 lbs
155.2 mm / 6.11 inch
73.4 mm / 2.89 inch
8 mm / 0.315 inch
160 g
0.3527 lbs
155.2 mm / 6.11 inch
73.4 mm / 2.89 inch
7.95 mm / 0.313 inch
160 g
0.3527 lbs
154.8 mm / 6.09 inch
73.6 mm / 2.9 inch
8 mm / 0.315 inch
162 g
0.3571 lbs
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays, for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesNotebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros
Equipment – Less RAM than last year
With 3 GB of working memory and 64 GB for data storage, the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) is similarly equipped as the P Smart (2019) but offers 1 GB less RAM than its predecessor. This is annoying, since it would have been a good way to differentiate the smartphone a bit more from its P Smart sibling model.
There continues to be a dual-SIM slot, with one of the slots also being able to fit a microSD card, which would then block one slot. The microSD can only be used for your own data and not for apps, and it also cannot be formatted as internal storage.
There is a microUSB connection and a 3.5-mm audio port at the bottom edge.
Left: No connections
Left: No connections
Right: volume rocker, standby button
Right: volume rocker, standby button
Bottom: speaker, microUSB, microphone, 3.5-mm audio port
Bottom: speaker, microUSB, microphone, 3.5-mm audio port
Top: nanoSIM/microSD card slot, microphone
Top: nanoSIM/microSD card slot, microphone
Software – Android 9 is installed on the Huawei smartphone
Our test unit is already based on Android 9, and at the time of our test the security patches are from April 1, 2019, so they are quite current. In addition to the in-house Huawei shop, there are also numerous other apps preinstalled. However, they can all be uninstalled if you like, even the third-party advertising apps. While it would of course be better if the smartphone came without these apps, it is positive and not a given that you can uninstall them.
Huawei's own user interface layer above Android is called EMUI. It offers a slightly changed design and several additional functions compared to stock Android. For example, there is a simple mode where you can only access the most important functions using large icons. There is no dark mode, however.
Software Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Software Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Software Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
Software Huawei P Smart Plus (2019)
The Asus ZenFone 4 will not see a stable Android Pie update. (Source: CNET)
Asus arrests development for its Zenfone 4 Android Pie update
Image via Paper Phone
Google's printable Paper Phone aims to provide the smartphone experience without the smartphone
If any of these app icons are on your iPhone or iPad, uninstall them immediately. (Image via Wandera)
Trojan malware found in 17 apps on Apple App Store
There is still life in the OnePlus 3 and 3T yet. (Image source: Android Planet)
The OnePlus 3 and 3T can now be upgraded to Android 10
Next Page ⟩
Communication and GPS – Only the most necessary frequencies
In terms of WLAN, our test unit offers similar transfer rates as the P Smart (2019) in our test with the Linksys EA8500 reference router and is thus significantly faster than the Huawei P Smart Plus from last year. When scrolling through websites, images are in parts already preloaded, so that the pages are rendered quickly. Near the router, the full reception is available; at 10-meter distance and through three walls there is still half the signal and pages render slightly slower.
Since only the most necessary 4G frequencies are available, you might have to do without mobile 4G Internet when traveling to far-away countries. In city surroundings, the reception was good in the well-established German D2 net.
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
(5.9 - 939, n=435)
226 MBit/s ∼100%+35%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
167 (min: 108, max: 214) MBit/s ∼74%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 28, max: 206) MBit/s ∼73%-2%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 94, max: 1) MBit/s ∼50%-33%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
64 (min: 52, max: 69) MBit/s ∼28%-62%
Huawei P Smart Plus
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25%-66%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 (min: 42, max: 52) MBit/s ∼21%-71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P Smart 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 (min: 197, max: 262) MBit/s ∼100%+2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 157, max: 243) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
(9.4 - 703, n=435)
216 MBit/s ∼96%-2%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 107, max: 117) MBit/s ∼50%-49%
Huawei P Smart Plus
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 (min: 50, max: 57) MBit/s ∼24%-75%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.3 (min: 29, max: 56) MBit/s ∼%-81%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Mali-G71 MP2, 7904, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 (min: 2, max: 93) MBit/s ∼%-81%
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
0
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø166 (108-214)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø221 (157-243)
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
GPS Test - indoors
GPS Test - indoors
GPS Test - near the window
GPS Test - near the window
GPS Test - outdoors
GPS Test - outdoors
Determining our location via GPS is not possible indoors, not even near a window. Outdoors, it takes a moment before sufficient satellites become available to locate us with an accuracy of up to five meters. The location in Google Maps is accurate up to a few meters, and the compass points towards the right-looking direction.
Our practice test, which is a bike tour with the P Smart Plus (2019) and the Garmin Edge 520 on board for comparison, shows slightly wobbly locating abilities in all situations. Our test unit likes to take short cuts or places us next to the road, so it should only be used for simple navigation tasks.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – roundabout
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – roundabout
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – overview
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – overview
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – roundabout
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – roundabout
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – bridge
GPS Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) – bridge
Telephone Functions and Voice Quality – Easily understandable
As telephone app, the known in-house app from Huawei is used. You are greeted by the dial pad and can then select contacts and favorites via tabs.
We like the voice quality. If necessary, the earpiece and the speaker can become quite loud, reproducing the voice of our conversation partner well. At maximum volume, there is some slight booming, but this is not very pronounced. Our voice is also transferred well, whether we speak quietly or with a loud voice.
Cameras – Triple camera with wide angle lens
Picture taken with the front camera
Picture taken with the front camera
The camera setup makes up the largest difference between the Huawei P Smart (2019) and the P Smart Plus (2019). On the back of the Plus model, there are three cameras with a higher resolution than in the sibling model. The main camera offers 24 megapixels, and there is an additional wide angle lens with 16 megapixels and another lens with 2 megapixels for calculating the depth sharpness.
By default, the software of the main camera uses a 12-megapixel resolution where two pixels are combined into one, so more information per pixel is available. However, you can also use the full 24-megapixel resolution if you like.
The wide angle lens is a welcome addition to make the camera more flexible. However, unfortunately a smooth zoom is not possible with the camera software and you can merely switch between the main camera and the wide angle lens. In addition, the wide angle lens produces a clear fish-eye effect, so the edges are distorted.
Compared to higher-quality camera modules, the main camera shows little dynamic in dark areas, and for nearby objects the image sharpness is also not ideal. In pictures of the surroundings, the color reproduction is not bad, and far away objects are also depicted with a good detail level. In weak light conditions, the P Smart Plus (2019) is at the level of its price range but is unable to keep up with more-expensive camera modules in terms of sharpness and level of detail.
Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 30 fps, and other camera apps also offer no improvement here. You can also use the standard or the wide angle lens, and you can even switch during the recording. The recorded videos offer a decent detail and color reproduction, but the aperture reacts to changes in brightness in a slightly delayed manner and also with visible steps. In addition, the compression of videos is apparently fairly strong, since you can see pixelation in the light transitions.
The front camera corresponds to the camera in the Huawei P Smart (2019) with 8 megapixels. It is also slightly grainy here and offers little detail. However, colors are reproduced fairly well, so the quality should be sufficient for the occasional selfie.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load imagesHuawei P Smart Plus (2019)Apple iPhone XS MaxOnePlus 6TOlympus E-M10 II
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the wide angle lens
Picture taken with the wide angle lens
In our tests in the lab under controlled light conditions, the main camera of the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) noticeably shows frayed edges in the details, and the contrast is also too low, which can be seen in the black writing on a dark background that you can hardly distinguish.
The color reproduction is okay overall, but the color areas are often not reproduced cleanly but with pixelation.
Picture taken of the test chart
Picture taken of the test chart
Detail of the test chart
Detail of the test chart
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
Accessories and Warranty – A good amount of accessories
In addition to the charger and the USB cable, a silicon bumper case and a headset are also included. There is also a SIM tool to open the tray. There are no specific accessories for this smartphone on Huawei's website at the moment.
The manufacturer offers a 24-month warranty for its smartphones.
Input Devices and Navigation – A smooth touchscreen in the P Smart Plus (2019)
The touchscreen with the fixed protective film is easy to use and hardly offers any resistance to the finger. As the keyboard app, SwiftKey is used, and the keyboard can be adjusted extensively. You can also install other input methods without any trouble.
There is a fingerprint sensor on the back that responds very quickly and reliably. For face recognition, Huawei's Face Scan is used, which unlocks the smartphone fairly reliably in our test, but this only works in light surroundings. In addition, this method is not as secure as a fingerprint sensor or face recognition based on additional hardware.
Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - portrait
Keyboard - landscape
Keyboard - landscape
Display – Similar to the sibling model
Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
The display corresponds to that in the Huawei P Smart (2019) and only differs in some details in the measurements. The overall deviation of 8% is just barely within the customary range of a series. Overall, the display is at the same level as those of other smartphones of this price range. We particularly like the low black value.
451
cd/m² 423
cd/m² 402
cd/m²
434
cd/m² 427
cd/m² 380
cd/m²
426
cd/m² 408
cd/m² 387
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 451 cd/m² Average: 415.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 427 cd/m²
Contrast: 2135:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.95 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21 Huawei P Smart 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2 Huawei P Smart Plus
IPS/LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.3 Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2 Honor 10 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21 Samsung Galaxy M20
PLS TFT, 2340x1080, 6.3
Screen
-8%
-73%
-69%
-27%
-76%
Brightness middle
427
458 7%
479 12%
471 10%
467 9%
452 6%
Brightness
415
440 6%
471 13%
453 9%
446 7%
445 7%
Brightness Distribution
84
85 1%
94 12%
94 12%
89 6%
92 10%
Black Level *
0.2
0.35 -75%
0.27 -35%
0.5 -150%
0.58 -190%
0.41 -105%
Contrast
2135
1309 -39%
1774 -17%
942 -56%
805 -62%
1102 -48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.95
1.4 28%
6.24 -220%
5.5 -2%
1.5 23%
5.3 -172%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.47
3.8 15%
10.05 -125%
7.95 -78%
4.5 -1%
9.5 -113%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
2.4 -4%
7.4 -222%
5 -117%
2.4 -4%
6.8 -196%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.39 92%
2.326 95%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6414 101%
6235 104%
8942 73%
7654 85%
6387 102%
8355 78%
* . smaller is better
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9368 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.
In the lab, we measure PWM flickering at very low brightness values. On the other hand, the response times in our test are minimally faster than those of the sibling model.
There are two presets for the image display: Vivid and Normal. With the Vivid setting, we measure a clear blue tint that almost completely disappears in the Normal setting. Also, the colors are reproduced very accurately in the Normal setting, while there are more deviations in the Vivid setting. At the same time, the colors then also appear more vivid, as the name already indicates.
CalMAN Grayscales – Vivid setting
CalMAN Grayscales – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Accuracy – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Accuracy – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space sRGB – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space sRGB – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space AdobeRGB – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space AdobeRGB – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space DCI P3 – Vivid setting
CalMAN Color Space DCI P3 – Vivid setting
CalMAN Saturation – Vivid setting
CalMAN Saturation – Vivid setting
CalMAN Grayscales – Normal setting
CalMAN Grayscales – Normal setting
CalMAN Color Accuracy – Normal setting
CalMAN Color Accuracy – Normal setting
CalMAN Color Space sRGB – Normal setting
CalMAN Color Space sRGB – Normal setting
CalMAN Saturation – Normal setting
CalMAN Saturation – Normal setting
Display Response Times
ℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms . rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms . rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Outdoors, the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) does fairly well, but in direct sunlight you can hardly see anything on the display anymore. The brightness sensor is fairly reliable in choosing the correct brightness setting.
We have no complaints about the viewing angles, and the colors are also reproduced well from very steep viewing angles.
Outdoor use – direct sunlight using the brightness sensor
Outdoor use – direct sunlight using the brightness sensor
Outdoor use – brightness sensor
Outdoor use – brightness sensor
استفاده در فضای باز - حداکثر روشنایی
Outdoor use – maximum brightness
استفاده در فضای باز - روشنایی متوسط
Outdoor use – medium brightness
استفاده در فضای باز - حداقل روشنایی
Outdoor use – minimum brightness
زاویه دید
Viewing angles
Performance – Midrange performance is available
As in the Huawei P Smart (2019), the Kirin 710, which is an SoC from Huawei's own production, is also used in the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). It has a total of eight processor cores, four with a maximum 2.2 GHz and four with a maximum 1.7 GHz clock speed. Accordingly, the performance is at the same level as that of the sibling model. However, due to its smaller working memory, the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) achieves less points than the P Smart Plus (20), which uses the same SoC.
Overall, the processor performance is at the level of the price class, and we rarely notice any stutters during operation.
As the graphics solution, the Mali-G51 MP4 is used, and there are definitely some midrange graphics cards that offer less performance. So the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) does well here in comparison.
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v7 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3133 Points ∼67%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼67%+1%
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4066 Points ∼87%+30%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4006 Points ∼86%+28%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼67%+1%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3704 Points ∼79%+%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
(2631 - 4083, n=9)
3500 Points ∼75%+12%
Average of class Smartphone
(663 - 21070, n=321)
4685 Points ∼100%+50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5426 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5407 Points ∼97%0%
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5585 Points ∼100%+3%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼85%-12%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5266 Points ∼94%-3%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4096 Points ∼73%-25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
(5266 - 5615, n=9)
5457 Points ∼98%+1%
Average of class Smartphone
(883 - 11598, n=380)
4703 Points ∼84%-13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1539 Points ∼97%
Huawei P Smart 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1527 Points ∼96%-1%
Huawei P Smart Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1593 Points ∼100%+4%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼79%-%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1523 Points ∼96%-1%
Samsung Galaxy M20
Samsung Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1320 Points ∼83%-14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
(1523 - 1614, n=9)
1561 Points ∼98%+1%
Average of class Smartphone
(390 - 4824, n=380)
1420 Points ∼89%-8%
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
In general, the browser performance is good in the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). Pages are rendered quickly, and in the benchmarks the smartphone places in the middle or towards the top of the comparison field.
More-demanding HTML-5 pages are also loaded quickly and displayed fairly smoothly.
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼100%+%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 32.1, n=4)
31 Points ∼87%+3%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
30. Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy M20 (Samsung Brwoser 9.2)
22.57 Points ∼64%-25%
* . smaller is better
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
In terms of storage speed, there are hardly any differences to the Huawei P Smart (2019), and the eMMC storage is slightly faster than those in many comparison devices.
With our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference storage card, the Huawei smartphone also achieves decent read and write rates.
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 Huawei P Smart 2019 Huawei P Smart Plus Motorola Moto G7 Honor 10 Lite Samsung Galaxy M20 Average 64 GB eMMC Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
27%
21%
3%
2%
-7%
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%
51.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -22%
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%
66.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%
65.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=98) -14%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=4) -26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%
76.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%
75.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%
81.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%
76.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=98) 0%
67.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=4) -12%
Random Write 4KB
77.3
70.7 -9%
74 -4%
75.6 -2%
66.06 -15%
44 -43%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112) -69%
21.4 (0.14 - 250, n=737) -72%
Random Read 4KB
40.3
45.66 13%
102.5 154%
69.3 72%
45.15 12%
64 59%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112) 35%
46.6 (1.59 - 196, n=737) 16%
Sequential Write 256KB
152.8
191.4 25%
200.5 31%
216 41%
190.55 25%
137 -10%
171 (40 - 246, n=112) 12%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=737) -38%
Sequential Read 256KB
295.4
288.27 -2%
303.2 3%
297 1%
288.55 -2%
300 2%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=112) -8%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=737) -9%
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Games – Gaming possible
Basically you can play games fairly well with the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). The touchscreen with its smooth surface is responsive and the position sensor is also reliable.
Using the GameBench app, we evaluate the frame rates in several popular games. In Asphalt 9, some sudden frame-rate fluctuations become apparent at high quality settings during the latter part of our run. However, subjectively we did not notice them; perhaps they were just too short to see. On the other hand, Arena of Valor runs smoothly at 30 fps in all quality settings.
عرصه ولور
Arena of Valor
آسفالت 9
Asphalt 9
0
10
20
30
40
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø25.7 (1-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø29.7 (27-31)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø32.2 (28-33)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø31.3 (29-32)
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Emissions – The P Smart Plus (2019) throttles
Temperature
تست باتری GFXBench
GFXBench battery test
In the temperature test, the Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) becomes significantly warmer than its sibling model. Up to 42.5 C (108.5 F) can become uncomfortable particularly during the summer, especially if you put the device in your pocket after longer load. On the other hand, there is hardly any noticeable warming during idle operation.
Unfortunately there is also a clearly noticeable performance drop after a longer period of load. During the 29th run of GFXBench Manhattan 3.1, the frame rate of our test unit drops by more than 25% compared to the first run. This can be tested easily with the battery test of GFXBench.
Max. Load
Idle
41.9 C
107 F 38.4 C
101 F 37.7 C
100 F
42.5 C
109 F 38.4 C
101 F 38.1 C
101 F
41.3 C
106 F 38.8 C
102 F 37.5 C
100 F
Maximum: 42.5 C = 109 F
Average: 39.4 C = 103 F
34.1 C
93 F 36.8 C
98 F 39.6 C
103 F
34.3 C
94 F 36.7 C
98 F 41 C
106 F
34.5 C
94 F 37.3 C
99 F 40.8 C
105 F
Maximum: 41 C = 106 F
Average: 37.2 C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.) 37.8 C = 100 F | Room Temperature 21.5 C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.5 C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.1 C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 C / 92 F.
Speaker
تست بلندگو نویز صورتی
Pink Noise speaker test
As in the P Smart (2019), the mono speaker is positioned on the bottom edge. It is slightly louder than that in the predecessor and offers slightly stronger and emphasized mids, producing a warmer sound. The sound is slightly more balanced overall than in the Huawei P Smart (2019).
For audiophile listeners it would still be more satisfying to connect headphones or speakers using the 3.5-mm port or Bluetooth. Although Bluetooth 5.0 is not included yet, the connection works very fast via cable as well as wireless, and the sound is transmitted cleanly.
dB(A)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Deep Bass
Middle Bass
High Bass
Lower Range
Mids
Higher Mids
Lower Highs
Mid Highs
Upper Highs
Super Highs
20
43
47
25
39.1
39.8
31
32.9
35.7
40
38.8
38.3
50
42.2
38.7
63
32.4
33.6
80
26.7
28.6
100
25.9
36.9
125
29.2
30.8
160
24.9
30.7
200
20.1
41.7
250
19.1
42.7
315
.9
52.4
400
.5
57
500
19.5
61.1
630
17.1
67.6
800
16.1
70.9
1000
16.2
72.5
1250
15.6
72
1600
16.4
68.5
2000
17
67.1
2500
16.3
63.6
3150
15.3
60
4000
15.4
71.5
5000
15.2
74.6
6300
15.2
71.6
8000
15.4
68.7
10000
15.5
65.9
12500
15.4
52
16000
15.5
48.6
SPL
71.3
67.1
73.6
66.7
28.7
81.8
N
26.7
20.8
28.2
.5
1.2
50.3
median 16.3
median 63.6
Delta
2.4
10.4
39.1
39.6
39.1
41.2
30.3
34.6
34.2
32.6
31.4
36.4
27.5
36.8
21.8
26.8
22.8
25.9
24.3
25.7
20.5
32.1
19.3
42.2
.7
50.3
17.3
52.7
16.7
55.4
16.5
54.9
16.6
58.1
15.6
58.6
15.1
61.6
14.1
61.6
14.1
60.9
14.4
66.5
13.9
68.6
13.8
68.3
13.6
64
14.6
69.9
14
70.5
14.2
72.6
13.7
69.4
13.7
63.9
13.9
55.6
63.8
69.7
63.4
26.9
79.2
16.6
22.9
16.8
0.9
41.9
median 14.6
median 60.9
2
7
hearing range
hide median
Pink Noise
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Huawei P Smart Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Huawei P Smart Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Battery Life – Room for expansion
Power Consumption
The power consumption overall is at a very similar level as that of the Huawei P Smart (2019). Only in the average idle scenario is the P Smart Plus slightly more efficient in our test. Overall as well, the P Smart Plus (2019) is a fairly low-consumption smartphone in its class.
Power Consumption
Off / Standby تاریکسبک 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle تاریکاواسطسبک 0.8 / 1.2 / 2.3 Watt
Load اواسطسبک 4.5 / 7.3 Watt
نوار رنگ
Key: min: تاریک, med: اواسط, max: سبک Metrahit Energy
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh Huawei P Smart 2019
3400 mAh Huawei P Smart Plus
3340 mAh Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh Samsung Galaxy M20
5000 mAh Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption
-17%
-47%
-17%
-22%
-15%
-21%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.84 -5%
1.3 -63%
1.1 -38%
1 -25%
0.94 -%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9) -19%
0.876 (0.2 - 3.4, n=770) -10%
Idle Average *
1.2
2.21 -84%
2.5 -108%
1.8 -50%
2.19 -83%
2.37 -98%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9) -76%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=769) -44%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.23 3%
3.6 -57%
2.6 -13%
2.2 4%
2.42 -5%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9) -6%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=770) 12%
Load Average *
4.5
4.2 7%
5 -11%
4.2 7%
4.64 -3%
3.83 15%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9) -4%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=764) 10%
Load Maximum *
7.3
7.86 -8%
7 4%
6.8 7%
7.7 -5%
5.07 31%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9) -1%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=764) 19%
* . smaller is better
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
Battery Life
In terms of the battery life, not much has changed, neither since the previous generation nor compared to the P Smart (2019). It continues to be about 8:43 hours in the WLAN test, which is a rather mediocre value that for example the Motorola Moto G7 or the Samsung Galaxy M20 can exceed significantly.
با این کار می توانید حداقل یک روز در مطب با خیال راحت وارد شوید و کسانی که از نظر اقتصادی اقتصادی تر هستند حتی می توانند دو روز را بدون پرداخت هزینه مدیریت کنند. هواوی شامل یک شارژر سریع است که طی 1.5 تا 2 ساعت دستگاه را به طور کامل شارژ می کند.
زمان باتری
بیکار (بدون WLAN ، حداقل روشنایی)
22h 26min
تست باتری NBC WiFi Websurfing 1.3
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 56min
بار (حداکثر روشنایی)
ساعت 9 دقیقه
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 میلی آمپر هواوی P Smart 2019
3400 میلی آمپر هواوی P Smart Plus
3340 میلی آمپر ساعت موتورولا موتور G7
3000 میلی آمپر ساعت Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh سامسونگ گلکسی M20
5000 میلی آمپر
زمان باتری
-4٪
-2٪
27٪
-7٪
61٪
خواننده / بیکار
1346
1293 -4٪
1548 15٪
1533 14٪
1904 41٪
H.264
536
464 -13٪
819 53٪
502 -6٪
1121 109٪
WiFi v1.3
523
506 -3٪
512 -2٪
798 53٪
484 -7٪
927.5 77٪
بار
249
257 3٪
219 -12٪
178 -29٪
288 16٪
Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)
طرفداران
+
لنزهای زاویه دید اضافی
+
کیفیت مناسب و مناسب
+
تکه های امنیتی فعلی
+
سریع WLAN
+
کیفیت صدای خوب
+
نمایشگر با کنتراست خوب
منفی
-
پرتاب زیر بار
-
عمر باتری فقط به طور متوسط
-
گرمایش نسبتاً زیاد
-
GPS کمی نادرست
حکم - برای هزینه اضافی کوچک انتخاب بهتری است
در بررسی: Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). واحد تست ارائه شده توسط سایبرپورت.
در بررسی: Huawei P Smart Plus (2019). واحد تست ارائه شده توسط سایبرپورت.
نکته خط مشی مدل هواوی در سال جاری کاملاً مشخص نیست: چرا سازنده دو دستگاه را به بازار عرضه می کند که علاوه بر دوربین فقط در جزئیات متفاوت هستند و تقریباً قیمت یکسانی دارند؟ Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) به هیچ وجه گوشی هوشمند مناسبی نیست و با سیستم سریعتر WLAN و دوربین سه گانه خود ، در مقایسه با نسخه قبلی خود پیشرفت هایی نیز از خود نشان می دهد.
از طرف دیگر ، GPS می توانست دقیق تر باشد و خراش و اثر انگشت به سمت عقب نیز بهینه نیست. تمام دستگاه های این سری نیز از نظر عمر باتری خود دارای ویژگی های جالبی هستند ، حتی اگر مصرف برق خیلی زیاد نباشد. بنابراین این احتمالاً مدیریت نیرو است که جایی برای پیشرفت باقی می گذارد.
Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) یک گوشی هوشمند میان رده با سیستم دوربین سه گانه است که به سختی با مدل خواهر و برادر خود فرق نمی کند.
بنابراین کدام یک را باید انتخاب کنید - Huawei P Smart Plus (2019) یا Huawei P Smart (2019) ؟ از نظر قیمت ، اختلاف تقریبا ناچیز است. به دلیل همین و شباهت های زیاد و دوربین بهتر ، می خواهیم مدل پلاس را بگیریم.
با این وجود امسال گزینه های خوبی نیز وجود دارد. می توانید با موتورولا موتورو G7 یا سامسونگ گلکسی M20 عمر باتری بیشتری داشته باشید . با داشتن Huawei P Smart در سال گذشته حتی می توانید چند یورو اضافی پس انداز کنید و حافظه کاری بیشتری نیز به دست آورید ، اما پس از آن نیز باید با دوربین کمتری انعطاف پذیر باشید.
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 -05/23/2019v6 (قدیمی)
فلورین اشمیت
شاسی86٪
صفحه کلید65/ 75 → 87٪
دستگاه اشاره گر89٪
اتصال43/ 60 → 72٪
وزن91٪
باتری91٪
نمایش دادن89٪
عملکرد بازی ها45/ 63 → 72٪
عملکرد برنامه63 70 70 → 90
درجه حرارت88٪
سر و صدا100٪
سمعی65/ 91 → 71٪
دوربین71٪
میانگین76٪
85٪
تلفن هوشمند - میانگین وزن
درباره این سایت